Click for Text-Only version
Back to CUA Home
The Catholic University of America - Campus Legal Clearinghouse
 

 
Collage of Pictures

Affirmative Action

ADA Compliance

Copyright

Employment

Environment

FERPA
Quick Clicks
FedLaw
Publications, Video, & Web Tutorials
Q & A
Resources, Forms, & Checklists
 

GLB/Security

Harassment

HIPAA

Immigration

Religious Issues

Research & Patents

Student Life Issues

IDEA Scholarships

Campus Security

Tax

CLIC Home        CUA Policies        Text-Only        FedLaw        DC Law        Compliance Calendar       Compliance Partners        Links

FERPA

 

Definition of Education Record

Disclosure to the Student pursuant to the Student's Request

Disclosure to a Third Party with the Student's Consent

Disclosure Without Consent to a Third Party

Legitimate Educational Interest

Directory Information

Pursuant to Judicial Order
Release to Parents Without a Student's Consent
Corrections to the Record
Digital Issues

Some of these questions were posted and answered on the National Association of College and University Attorneys (NACUA) listserv.  All identifiers were removed, and permission sought (collectively) for use of same.  Special thanks to Steve McDonald, General Counsel, Rhode Island School of Design, for his FERPA expertise.  Steve is the editor of the 2nd edition of the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act: A Legal Compendium, available from NACUA. For anyone who wants to know all of the ins and outs of FERPA, this guide is indispensable.

 

Some of these question were posted on a post webinar page after the January 2009 NACUA web seminar on the new FERPA regulations. Answers to these questions were posted by Steve McDonald and Peg O'Donnell (CUA).   Institutions are free to use and adapt this material for educational purposes.

 

Definition of Education Record

 

Q. The FERPA regs define a student as "any individual who is or has been in attendance at an educational ...institution."  (34. C.F.R. 99.3). Admitted student comes on campus early for school related summer job (but not attending class), gets in trouble.  Are related documents "Educational Records?"  More broadly, do other universities treat records created prior to "attendance" (primarily admission documents) as Education Records?  Before the student attends?  Do the same records become Education Records after the student "attends"?"

 

A. Schools have discretion to determine when they first consider their students to be "in attendance" for purposes of FERPA, essentially at any  reasonable point from the date they accept their offers of admission to  the first day of classes.  http://www.ed.gov/policy/gen/guid/fpco/ferpa/library/vasexoffenderlaw081607.html
It generally doesn't make much difference, and most schools really don't even think about it, but public institutions sometimes go for the earlier dates, in order to avoid any argument that their student records are public records, and private  institutions sometimes go for the later dates, so that their student  records don't become subject to the "inspect and review" requirement any earlier than necessary.

 

FERPA does "reach back" and encompass the admission records of those applicants who do become students once they are "in attendance."  It does  not apply to the admission records of denied applicants or those applicants who are admitted but choose not to attend.

 

I haven't seen any guidance about pre-attendance employment records  specifically, but student employment records are considered education records if the job requires the holder to be a student (e.g., work  student, GTA, etc.).  If that's not the case, it shouldn't matter whether  the employment occurred before or after "attendance," because they  wouldn't be considered education records regardless.  If it is the case,  my guess is that the records would be treated similarly to admission  records, and thus become education records at the point of "attendance."

Answer courtesy of Steven J. McDonald, General Counsel, Rhode Island School of Design 

 

 

Q. Based on the definition of attendance, must we now assume that "continuing education" students and people in courses provided to employers are students for all FERPA purposes?

 

A.The outer limit of "student" is currently unclear, and I think that's intentional. FPCO tends not to like to make absolute pronouncements on an issue until it has really studied and understands the possible variations and implications. All we know for sure today is that someone can be a "student" even if he or she is not in a degree- or certificate-granting program. I hope that doesn't mean that everyone who attends a one-hour CLE program at your law school, or kids who attend a summer sports camp, and so forth are "students," because the implications are both unmanageable and absurd. Among other things, we'd have to give every one of them a copy of our annual notice and an opportunity to "opt out" of directory information, and, because they'd be "in attendance" at a college, the 10-year-olds in a junior baseball camp would control their own FERPA rights. However, the more something looks like your regular, degree-granting program (multiple-session CE classes on "academic" subjects, summer academic enrichment programs for high school students, and so forth), the more likely its participants are "students."

Q. How does FERPA apply to the records we maintain on students who have applied for admission, potentially been admitted, but not yet ENROLLED?

A. Until the student is in attendance at the institution the student does not have rights under FERPA. However, the FERPA protection does follow a record sent by a secondary school to the university. Although the applicant would not have a right to view that record, the record would have to be treated as confidential. See Jan. 30, 2001 FPCO opinion letter to Bill Reedy, Vermont Department of Education for definition of educational agency or institution.

 

Q. Are student photos stored in the student information system (used now by public safety, the President, campus ministry and various student life folks) “education records?” Are they “directory information?”

A. The photos are not defined in our policy as directory information, therefore they are not directory information.  They could have fit in a “security records” exception if they were used only by DPS, since they are accessed by others, they are “education records", and therefore must be treated confidentially.

 

Q Are the employment records of a student employee governed by FERPA?

A Student employment records are part of education records only if the employment is dependent on the student's status as a student. Therefore, records of graduate teaching or research assistants, work-study students, etc., are education records, not regular employment records and FERPA clearly applies. Access to and release of those records are governed by FERPA.

Q Are medical records covered under FERPA?

A   Records made or maintained by a physician, psychiatrist, psychologist, or other paraprofessional, if the records are used only for treatment of a student and made available only to those persons providing the treatment, are not considered education records under FERPA. These records are governed by strict confidentiality provisions of other laws, as well as canons of professional ethics. Note that once such medical records are disclosed to someone other than "those persons providing treatment," then the records are no longer considered medical records excluded from FERPA, and the student is entitled to access the records.

 

Q We have been asked to provide advice to our College's Counseling Center on what student medical information the Center can share with College officials on a need-to-know basis.  They want to know what they can disclose and when they should do so.  Can anyone please direct me to a good discussion or analysis of this topic?

A Student medical information and records are exempt from HIPAA and are instead governed by FERPA.  When used solely for treatment purposes, they are exempt from the coverage of FERPA and HIPAA.  When used for any other purpose within the university, such as academic decisions about medical withdrawal from class or an academic disability accommodation, they are education records and FERPA rules apply. FERPA would allow you to release them to a school official within your university who has a legitimate interest in the records without the student's permission.  Those terms should be defined in your FERPA policy.

BUT, and this is a big caveat, state laws usually also govern these records and particularly with regard to mental health records, will place restrictions on whether you can release them outside of the treatment context without permission. You will almost always be allowed to release them to appropriate officials for health and safety reasons under most statutory schemes, and sometimes will be compelled to do so, depending on your state's common law and statutes.

 

Answer courtesy of  Jeffery L. Graves,  Associate Vice President for  Institutional Compliance and Legal Affairs, The University of Texas at Austin, April 2006.

Q Are statements by student witnesses gathered in connection with a university investigation included in FERPA's definition of "education records"?

A Depending on the nature of the university's investigation, the documents might well be considered education records. FERPA defines this term very broadly, to constitute "those records . . . which (i) contain information directly related to a student; and (ii) are maintained by an educational agency or institution . . .." 20 U.S.C. § 1232g(a)(4)(A). There is no requirement that the records be related to the student's education. There is an exception, however, for "records maintained by a law enforcement unit of the educational agency or institution that were created by that law enforcement unit for the purpose of law enforcement." 20 U.S.C. § 1232g(a)(4)(B)(i). Thus, if the investigation was conducted by a campus police department and the purpose of the investigation was to enforce the law, rather than to pursue an internal disciplinary proceeding, the records in question would not be "education records" under FERPA.

 

Q Is a student's assignment (written or perhaps a video production), once handed in to a professor, an education record protected by FERPA?

A In a September 1, 1993, opinion letter to the American Library Association, LeRoy Rooker, the Director of the Family Policy Compliance Office, stated the following:

              Generally, any written examination or paper that is prepared by a student

              and that reveals or discloses a student's identity would be considered an

              'education record' under [the regulatory] definition (so long as it is maintained

              by the institution). That is, in ordinary circumstances FERPA prevents an

              institution from disclosing or publishing a student's written examination or

              paper without prior written consent, except in accordance with the specific

              exceptions set forth in 34 C.F.R. § 99.31." 34 CFR 99.31 lists a number of

              exceptions, including disclosure to other school officials with a legitimate

              educational interest; disclosure in connection with financial aid for certain

              purposes; stated and local educational authorities; and to accrediting

              organizations among others.

 

Q Are "outgoing" letters of recommendations for current students education records? Even if not so defined, can the recommendation include personally identifiable information (such as grade in a specific course) without getting the student's written consent to the disclosure?

A We advise obtaining written consent for the release of education data in letters of recommendation. One practical way to avoid requiring written consent may be to have the faculty member give the letter of recommendation to the student and to let the student release the data to the prospective employer. Obviously, this approach may raise other concerns, and is not an option in many situations.

 

Q When are application materials of students protected under FERPA?

A FERPA defines student as any individual who is or has been in attendance at an educational agency or institution and regarding whom the agency or institution maintains education records. 34 CFR § 99.3. In interpreting this definition with respect to application materials, the Family Policy Compliance Office (FPCO)  has generally taken the position that records sent by the student to the university are not protected as education records unless/until the student matriculates. In contrast, because records about a student sent directly from the high school to the university would be covered as education records by virtue of their status as records of the high school, the FPCO  views these materials as covered under FERPA regardless of whether or not the student matriculates. Finally, The FPCO has stated that educational testing agency records sent about a student would not be protected unless the student matriculates, as the student was not in attendance at the agency, and thus the FERPA confidentiality provision did not attach at the time of taking the test, unlike the case with records created by a high school. (See Jan. 30, 2001 FPCO opinion letter to Bill Reedy, Vermont Department of Education for definition of educational agency or institution.) 

 

A videotape made by the university of an audition required as part of the application process for the School of Music is not an education record unless/until the student matriculates.  The School is advised to make prospective applicants aware that the videotape will be made and used for admission and financial aid decisions only.

 

Note also that certain state laws provide protection for student applicant data above and beyond what might be protected by FERPA.  For a case on this topic that is controlling only in Wisconsin, see J. Marshall Osborn and Center for Equal Opportunity v. Bd. of Regents of the University of Wisconsin, 2002 WI 83, 00-2861 (decided July 2, 2002).

 

Q  We are about to start recruiting from among our current students for a few to participate in a grant that will give them some tuition money.  Once they have indicated an interest in the special program, can we just automatically use their admission materials or do we have to ask their permission to use things from those materials such as transcripts and names of references?  Their applications for this special tuition program will be reviewed by the dean, a faculty member and an outside expert in the discipline involved.

A There are two slightly different perspectives students might have on this. First, if they look at it as a FERPA "confidentiality of student records" issue, the admissions materials are indeed "education records" for enrolled students (to the extent you retain the admissions materials in your files) and thus are protected by FERPA. You would be permitted to look at them if you have a release from the student or for any "legitimate educational interest" reason.  It is likely that this purpose would qualify as a legitimate interest. Second, however, as a practical matter you have to anticipate the students' expectations.  Did they think when they initially applied that their admissions reference letters would ever be used for some other purpose?  The safest way is to get their permission for whatever you use. It would be sufficient, as part of the application process for this grant program, to say something like, "applicants acknowledge that materials accompanying their application for admission to the School, including but not limited to letters of reference, writing samples, test scores and transcripts, may be considered by the School in determining whether to make an award under the special grant program."

 

Q If a record is not protected by FERPA, does this mean the record is not confidential?

A  Not necessarily.  It is important to realize that other laws and CUA policies govern the release of records that are not education records.   For example, employment records are protected by CUA personnel policies.  

 

Q Are records of campus disciplinary proceedings protected under FERPA?

A Yes.  Narrow exceptions exist.  The regulations at 34 CFR 99.31(a)(14) permit results of a disciplinary proceeding to be disclosed regarding a crime of violence or a non-forcible sex offense if the perpretator has violated the school's policies and is found to be an alleged perpretator of a crime of violence or a non-forcible sex offense.  The School may not disclose the names of any other student, including a victim or witness, without prior written consent of the student. The law requires (under the Campus Sexual Assault Victim Bill of Rights) results of a disciplinary proceeding to be disclosed to a victim and the accused when the proceeding involves a sex offense.

 

Q Do any special rules apply to transcripts or social security numbers?

A Yes.  Although FERPA does not address transcripts separately, registrars are very careful about release of transcripts, and CUA policy is that only the Registrar is authorized to issue transcripts, and an official transcript is issued only when requested by the student in writing.  Parents of dependent students may obtain transcripts without written permission from the student.  Social Security numbers are personally identifiable and contain private information.  They must be treated as education records. See also the Gramm Leach Bliley Act for futher information on security requirements with respect to social security numbers that are obtained pursuant to financial transactions.

 

Q Do you consider faculty evaluation forms filled out and signed by students to be a part of that student's education record under FERPA?

 

A. It's not clear exactly what information is in those forms, but if (a) you "maintain" them, and (b) they're "directly related" to a student, then they're education records.  However, just because a portion of a record that you maintain is directly related to a student doesn't necessarily mean that the entire record is an education record.  In a February 10, 1995 guidance letter to Hugo Sonnenschein at the University of Chicago (p. 339 of the Compendium), FPCO stated as follows:


Ordinarily, an institution is expected to provide access to an entire document, or group of documents, that contains information directly related to a student, and not just the parts that are, in fact, directly related to the student.  In other words, FERPA generally enables parents and students to know about the context in which the directly related information is maintained, rather than limiting them to viewing only the directly related information itself.

We recognize that it may be appropriate in certain circumstances to segregate and remove those parts not directly related to a student to provide the student full access to his or her education records. . . .This Office believes that this 'principle of segregation' may apply with equal force where the institution seeks to protect the records of an employee, rather than the education records of a student.

 

Note, however, that the analysis is not entirely clear and that FPCO subsequently stated that it was "reevaluating" its position, although apparently for other, unrelated reasons. (Answer courtesy of Steven J. McDonald, General Counsel, Rhode Island School of Design.)

 

Q. Are records of applicants who do not matriculate protected as "education records" under FERPA?

 

A. The Family Policy Compliance Office has generally taken the position that records sent by the student to the university are not protected as education records unless/until the student matriculates. In contrast, records about a student sent directly from the high school to the university would be covered as education records regardless of whether or not the student matriculates. Finally, educational testing agency records sent about a student would not be protected unless the student matriculates, as the student was not in attendance at the agency, and thus the FERPA  confidentiality provision did not attach at the time of taking the  test, unlike the case with records created by a high school. See the Jan. 30, 2001 FPCO opinion letter to Bill Reedy, Vermont Department of Education for definition of educational agency or institution.  

 


 

 Return to Top of Page

 

Disclosure to the student pursuant to the student's request

 

May we respond to a student's request for his/her own records if the request was sent via the student's institutional e-mail account (thereby identifying and authenticating the student)? I realize that 34 CFR § 99.30(d) doesn't apply to a student requesting access to his/her own records.

 

A. If you are sending the records of the student to the student at his/her home address, I don't see a problem, as there is no potential for unauthorized disclosure here. If you are sending the records to the requester by email, then I see a possible problem for an unauthorized disclosure if it turns out someone else created a fake email request making it look like it came from the student. This is actually pretty easy to do. So I would allow students to submit email requests as you suggest, but advise that the disclosure will be made by US mail to their home address.

 

This is a question regarding letters of recommendation in a student's file and whether we will give the student a copy or forward the copy to Law School Admissions Committee(LSAC)  of another school.  Must we (or even may we) give a copy a. to the student or b. to LSAC or any other outside entity that the student designates?

A.  As to this specific former student, the letter of recommendation is an "education record" and therefore the student has a right to see it. (CUA Student Records policy IV.F Student Access to Records provides in part, "A student may receive a copy of any and all records to which he or she has lawful access...[except transcripts from another school]." Further, the policy says that documents written or solicited after January 1, 1975 can be confidential (and thus not disclosed to the student) only if the student has waived access to the letter in writing. So, the first thing is to check and see whether the student waived access to the letter. If he did, he can't see it; he'll have to ask the author for another letter or have the author provide written or email notice to us directly (not through the student) with permission to give the student a copy of the letter. Likewise, if he did waive access, we can't provide the letter to any other outside entity, such as LSAC, without the author's written permission to specifically disclose the letter to that entity, as well as the student's consent under 34 CFR § 99.30.  If the student did not waive access to the letter, he's entitled to a copy. In that case, whether you want to forward it to others on his behalf is up to you -- I'd just send him the copy and let him do with it what he wants.

 

Q A student has requested to review her records, a term I read to be defined very broadly, to include not only her "official" record, maintained by the dean's office in her school, but also files maintained by individuals, and a lot of other things in writing about her created by employees of the institution. In this case, the files in question contain some highly critical comments by faculty in the form of letters to the dean, and to faculty committees charged with reviewing her progress toward her (Ph.D.) degree. Must these documents be released to the student?

A Unless these are letters of recommendation, used only for the intended purpose, and as to which the student waived her right of review she's entitled to see those letters.

 

Q A student at a private university requests a copy of the tape recording of his own recently concluded disciplinary hearing. The University Code of Conduct states that hearings are tape recorded but is silent on their use and availability. Is the tape recording an "education record" requiring the University to give the student a copy? If it is, must the University  erase testimony from another student because that testimony is also considered part of that student's education record, or require the requesting student to obtain a subpoena?

 

A FERPA applies to electronic records as well as paper ones (see 34 CFR 99.3), and (putting aside the possible implications of the Owasso case,) your tape is therefore an "education record" as long as it is "directly related to a student" (which basically means is personally identifiable to a student) and you "maintain" it, which seems likely. If so, FERPA gives the student the right to *review* the tape, but *not* to a copy of it, unless "circumstances effectively prevent the . . . student from exercising the right to inspect and review" (see 34 CFR 99.10), as, for example, if the student has moved across country. Ordinarily, you must redact information that is personally identifiable to other students before allowing the student to review the tape (see 34 CFR 99.12), but FERPA does not "override any federally protected due process rights" that the student may have to that other information (see Revised OCR Sexual Harassment Guidance. See also 8/31/94 FPCO letter to Pete Swan at p. 225 of the NACUA FERPA Compendium (2d ed.); 2/10/95 FPCO letter to Hugo Sonnenschein, id. at p. 339 ; and follow-up letter, id. at p. 346. (answer from Steven J. McDonald, NACUANET 12-19-02)

 

Q If a career center offers a letter of recommendation service (basically holding copies of recommendations and then mailing them out to the institution specified by the student), would the career center violate FERPA by requiring students to waive their rights to review the records as a condition to using the service provided?

 

A Schools may require a student to waive his/her right to inspect and review letters of recommendation in this instance.  Although there is language in the regulation (34 CFR 99.12 (c)) stating that a waiver cannot be required of the student  as a condition for receipt of a service or benefit from the school, when the activity in question is an extracurrcular activity not basic to the education, a waiver can be required. The student can then either choose to use this service or choose not to use the service.

 

Return to Top of Page

 

Disclosure to a Third Party with the Student's Consent

 

Q. When a student's fill out a written consent form allowing the University to disclose records to a third-party, they identify a "secret word" that the third-party should be able to produce if the third-party requests information from the student's records. If a third-party sends a request for records via e-mail to the University that contains the "secret word," is the University allowed to respond to the e-mail?

 

A. I don't think this approach would necessarily violate FERPA. However, while it isn't required by FERPA, the school may want to include a notice on the form that the student should take care to protect the confidentiality of the secret code word as the code word is the only element needed to obtain information from education records. The student's completion and signature on the form would be agreement with that condition.

 

Q. What is the relationship between FERPA and the NCAA, which requests and maintains all sorts of information in its investigations and in its routine, required reporting?

 

A.Student athletes sign a release allowing sharing of the education record information with the NCAA. 

 

Q Can a professor have access to student photos stored in the CUA student information system?

A. Yes, as long as she treats them as any other confidential education record. As with any other records, this presumes the professor is a school official with a legitimate educational interest.

 

Q What rights does FERPA give to students?

A FERPA grants students the right to inspect and review their records, except for those portions of the record that are not considered "education records." For example, a student would not have a right to review his or her medical records, as these are not covered under FERPA. (CUA policy allows the student to have medical records reviewed by a physician or another appropriate medical professional of the student’s choice.) The student is not allowed access to those portions of a record that contain information about students other than the requesting student, to financial records of the student’s parents submitted in confidence, or to confidential letters of recommendation to which the student has waived access. The student is also not allowed access to records connected with an application to attend CUA or a component unit of CUA if that application is denied.

 

Q What if I receive a fax from a student asking me to send records? Do I need an original ink signature?

A CUA policy is to grant student inspection of records only upon written request, presented in person with appropriate identification, and made in the presence of the designated personnel of the office maintaining the records. However, CUA does honor faxed requests for transcripts if the fax contains the student's authentic signature. In April of 2004, the Department of Education issued final regulations authorizing schools to establish a process for release of education records to a third party pursuant to digital signatures.

 

Q Does FERPA require the disclosure of records in the following situation: two students are named in one record, and the disclosure of the record would identify each student even with the redaction of names, addresses, and other identifiable information?

A The Family Policy Compliance Office has advised that if a misconduct record that involved two students must be disclosed to Student A, when disclosure would necessarily reveal information about Student B, even when the name of Student B was redacted, the best choice is to err on the side of privacy for the Student B rather than provide access to Student A. The regulation at 34 C.F.R. § 99.12(a) allows oral disclosure of the information to the student, and this is an alternative where redaction might not be feasible.

 

Q A student who has dropped out of a graduate program wants copies of all e-mail received by or sent from his student e-mail account. Should he get them?

A Routine e-mail probably falls outside of FERPA. Email could be an education record if it is directly related to a student, and maintained by the school. For example, individual messages, such as a post between a professor and a student discussing course performance, may qualify, due to content of the record rather than its form.

Q Does an undergraduate who applies to graduate school at the same institution have access to his application file?
A The applicant is not considered a "student" in the graduate school until he or she is accepted and enrolled. In the interim, the application file is not an education record under FERPA.

Q May a faculty member refuse to provide a copy (as opposed to merely allowing a review) of a final exam to a student who has made an inspection request under FERPA?

A The main provision governing this issue is 34 C.F.R. § 99.10(a) which provides that a student must be given an opportunity "to inspect and review the student's education records." However, section 99.10(d) provides that if -- and apparently only if -- "circumstances effectively prevent the . . . student from exercising the right to inspect and review the student's education records, the educational institution . . . shall (1) provide the . . . student with a copy of the records requested; or (2) make other arrangements for the . . . student to inspect and review the records under this section." This exception has been applied primarily in circumstances in which the student is a considerable geographical distance from campus and, even then, the student is not entitled to a copy if you can make "other arrangements."

 

Q A doctoral student has asked to review memoranda between faculty members and administrators concerning her comprehensive exams. Among the documents responsive to this request are documents in which faculty members discuss the student's exams but then go on to discuss unrelated topics, including commentary critical of other faculty members and administration. Keeping in mind that FERPA defines an education record as a record directly related to a student, should the department: (a) refuse to produce those documents that include discussions of other topics because the entire document is not directly related to the student, (b) redact the unrelated topics from the documents and produce the portions relating to the student, or (c) produce the entire document?

A Option (a) would violate FERPA. Option (b) will fully satisfy FERPA's disclosure requirement.

 

Q In the law school, when students come to the faculty office and ask to see their exam paper (which they are allowed to do), does the record custodian have to ask them for an ID?

A The safe answer would be, yes. However, law students are bound by the ABA's Rules of Professional Conduct for Law Students. Thus, when law students log in to see an exam, list the date, and their confidential exam number, they are presumed to be truthful in representing that they have the right to see a particular exam. Furthermore, the exam number process would make it difficult to fraudulently obtain the exam of another student.

 

Q If a student requests a copy of a transcript from another institution that happens to be in our university's file, does the student have a right to a copy of that transcript?

A You can choose to give a student a copy of that transcript, but to prevent possible misuse, it is recommended that the transcript from the other institution be stamped "Not an official copy." The institution only needs to give the student an opportunity to review and inspect records, and thus they are not entitled to an actual copy, unless failure to honor the request for the copy would deprive them of the right to view the record. AACRAO recommends telling the student to make their transcript request directly to the original institution. Guidelines for Postsecondary Institutions for Implementation of the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974 as Amended, rev. ed. 1998, American Association of Collegiate Registrars and Admissions Officers. The reasons for this recommendation are to prevent fraud, and as a professional courtesy to institutions that may not be issuing a transcript to a student who has a delinquent account.

 

Q May I charge a copying fee for the student record?

A Yes, in response to an authorized request for a copy of a student’s education records, CUA may charge a reasonable fee for the copy.

 

Q How can the staff of Student Accounts verify that they are speaking with a particular student when the conversation is on the telephone as opposed to in person?

A The office should work out some protocol whereby you ask enough questions of the student on the phone to satisfy you that you are speaking with the student and not with someone else - such as what grade did he/she get in a certain class, who was your professor for Politics, or other specific information that generally only the student would know.

 

Q What limits apply to subsequent disclosure of the educational record information once the information has been disclosed to someone other than the student?

A Records may be disclosed to a party outside the institution only if the student has given written permission for the additional disclosure, or if the disclosure meets one of the provisions under FERPA for disclosure. In addition, the party to whom the records are transmitted should be notified of the obligation to not further disclose the records. See the transmittal form OGC has drafted for this situation. Internally, a subsequent disclosure may occur if a legitimate educational interest exists, or if written permission has been obtained. This limitation does not apply to directory information.

 

Q Do you need to require an original signature on a FERPA request for records?
A The requirement of a "signature" is so the institution can reasonably verify that the student is the one making the request or giving authorization, e.g. for release of records.  If the "signature" (original, copied or faxed) is suspicious, then the institution should take steps to verify it before release. The university prefers the original ink signature, but will accept copies of releases if it is satisfied that the signature on the release is genuine. See also other answers on this page regarding when digital signatures may be honored for release of records to a third party. 

 

 Return to Top of Page

 

Disclosure Without Consent to a Third Party

Q. An on-campus speaker was videotaped, and the sponsoring department wants to put the video up on its website (i.e., non-commercial use). The videographer was in plain sight. The speaker's consent was obtained, but not those of students who asked questions (mostly off-camera). Anyone have a problem with posting the video?

A. If any of the students are "personally identifiable" (under FERPA's broad definition), I think you'd need FERPA consent. In a similar context, FPCO has stated that the transcript of a hearing that was held open at the student's request is still an "education record" and therefore can't be released without the student's consent.  You can include photographs in your list of directory information, but I doubt FPCO would agree to audio, at least generically.

Answer courtesy of Steven J. McDonald, General Counsel, Rhode Island School of Design.


Q If a student is studying at the school and a third party is paying for the student to attend the school, (for example, an employer) can information about the student's grades or academic progress be released to the payor without the student's consent?

 

A The financial aid exception at 34 CFR § 99.31(a)(4) allows disclosure if it is necessary to determine: eligibility for the aid, the amount of the aid, or the conditions for the aid, or to enforce the terms and conditions for the aid. If this provision is to be used as the basis for a disclosure, there should be some way to know the student has agreed to the conditions. This will have to be a written document. You should request a copy of the aid application with the student's signature if there is not one in the file.  

 

Q What should I do if someone calls from the media and asks for a copy of a student's transcript from her college years at the university?

A FERPA protects former students as well as current students and, thus, this information could not be released without written permission from the student. When the former student is deceased, the policy at CUA (which is set by the Provost) is that education records will not be released until 50 years after the person's death. Requests for exceptions must be addressed to the Office of General Counsel.

 

Q Is there any exception to the FERPA privacy restrictions for foreign students when the inquiry relates to their application for admission? For example, what about a long distance telephone call from a friend or relative calling on behalf of a prospective student (because the applicant may not speak English very well) asking for information about the status of the student's application?

A FERPA regulations suggest that there is no exception for foreign nationals. (Note that immigration law requires reporting certain information to the INS.) However, FERPA does not apply to prospective students who have not yet been admitted and thus nothing in FERPA prevents the institution from disclosing whether or not the foreign national has been admitted.

Q Does FERPA permit us to disclose education records to the spouse of a student? If so, under what statutory or regulatory authority?

A There are no spousal exceptions or rights under FERPA. In other words, the spouse has no right to the student's records.

 

Q Under the USA PATRIOT ACT provisions applicable to FERPA, can a school disclose student records without the student's consent in a situation where it believes, for example, that a chemistry student may be acquiring dangerous and volatile chemicals and the school wants to share with the FBI some of the emails the school exchanged with the student regarding these acquisitions?

A An excellent answer to this question, suggested by FERPA expert Steve McDonald, legal counsel at the Rhode Island School of Design, is that while the USA PATRIOT act exception to FERPA requires a court order (and so wouldn't be of much immediate import in this situation), the health and safety emergency exception to FERPA might be useful. See the discussion on the Department of Education site, and also the Family Policy Compliance Office "Dear Colleague" letter from April 2002.  Also note that if the information came to the school official through some other source, such as the official's personal knowledge of ads the student had posted on a website, then while the emails would be education records under FERPA,  the "information" in the mind of the official would not be an education record and could be disclosed.

 

Q Does the FERPA exception to the consent requirement for information related to financial aid apply in the case of financial aid received from a foreign government? For example, Canadian financial aid agency requests information from a US institution regarding students who have received aid from the agency.

 

A As long as it meets the provision in 99.31(a)(4)(ii) - that is, it is truly "aid" and is conditioned on the student's attendance at the school.  If they have to make a certain grade, then that counts, too. You should ask for a copy of the student's application used to obtain the aid.

 

Q  The FERPA regulations at 99.31 refer to a "crime of violence" or "non-forcible sex offense". What is the definition of these terms?

 

A See the chart for the definitions of these terms. The definitions come from the Appendix to the July 6, 2000 final rule implementing changes to the law allowing disclosures to parents and the public in certain instances.

 

Q As part of a periodic report to our Law School's accrediting agency, we are producing a table showing information about students who have been re-admitted to the law school (following academic exclusion) over the past seven years.  Can we show the name of each such student if we are required to do so by the accreditor or if we think it's necessary?  

 

A.  Yes, the CUA student records policy would permit the release of student names to an accreditor, but in the interests of protecting student privacy, names should not be released if they are not required for purposes of understanding the particular table being developed or for some other important need of the accreditation team.  In this case, it's hard to imagine why the accreditors would have to know individual student names and why the School could not instead substitute initials or a number for each student name. 

 



Last Revised 03-Nov-09 02:39 PM.